Disclaimer

This data is compiled by a non-professional for reference purposes. Information may not be 100% accurate. Always verify with your treating physician. Only Chinese domestic clinical trials are included (international trials like RMC-6236/RMC-9805 in the US are in a separate section).

PDAC Targeted Therapies — China Clinical Trials

Currently active clinical trials for PDAC in China, organized by target. Click drug names for more info.

Target Drug Name Population Trial Phase Efficacy Data
KRAS G12D (~40% of PDAC)
KRAS G12D HRS-4642
Hengrui 恒瑞
Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 3 Monotherapy: ORR 20.8%, DCR 79.2%, PFS 4.1mo, OS 7.2mo
+ AG: ORR 60.0%, DCR 93.3%
KRAS G12D GFH375
GenFleet 劲方
Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 2 Phase 3 Monotherapy (66 PDAC, 45 ≥ 2nd line): ORR 41%, DCR 97%
KRAS G12D RNK08954 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1/2 Phase 2 Monotherapy (17 PDAC): ORR 15%, DCR 85%, median duration 3.5mo
KRAS G12D TSN1611 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1/2 Monotherapy (800mg/1200mg QD, 1-2 prior lines): ORR 36.4%, DCR 72.7%
KRAS G12D ABSK141 / QLC1101 / DN022150 / HBW-012336 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1/2 Dose exploration — data pending
KRAS G12D NW-301D (TCR-T) Requires HLA-A*11:01 Phase 1
KRAS G12V
KRAS G12V NW-301V (TCR-T) Requires HLA-A*11:01 Phase 1 14 pts (CRC+PDAC): ORR 42.9%, DCR 78.6%. High-dose (10 pts): 5 PR, 5 SD
KRAS G12V KRAS G12V TCR-T (Changhai Hospital)
长海医院 金刚/郭世伟团队
Requires HLA-A*11:01 Phase 1 5 recurrent PDAC: 1 CR (4 liver mets completely resolved, sustained 5.5mo)
KRAS G12V IX001 (TCR-T) / KRAS TCR-T (可瑞生物) Requires HLA-A*11:01 Phase 1 Dose exploration
KRAS G12V XP-001-V2 (Vaccine) Multiple HLA types eligible Phase 1
KRAS G12C (Multiple Approved Drugs)
KRAS G12C JAB-21822 (戈来雷塞) Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 2 Phase 1 included 2 PDAC patients
KRAS G12C MK-1084 / HRS-7058 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 2
KRAS G12C 索托拉西布 / 阿达格拉西布 / 氟泽雷塞 / 格索雷塞 Approved Approved On market
Pan-KRAS (Multiple KRAS mutations)
Pan-KRAS JAB-23E73 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1 ≥160mg, 13 PDAC (mostly ≥3rd line): ORR 38.5%, DCR 84.6%
Pan-KRAS HBW-012462 / BGB-53038 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1 Dose exploration
Pan-KRAS RGL-232 / ABO2102 (Vaccines) Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1 mRNA vaccines targeting KRAS mutations
Pan-RAS (All RAS mutations)
Pan-RAS JYP0015 / GFH276 / HRS-7172 / HRS-2329 / AN9025 / BPI-572270 / ASKC189 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1 All in dose exploration stage
CLDN18.2 (⚠️ GI toxicity — monitor weight)
CLDN18.2 QLS31905 (CLDN18.2 × CD3 bispecific) Treatment-naive Phase 3 Monotherapy (12 PDAC): ORR 25%, DCR 91.67%, PFS 3.94mo
CLDN18.2 PT886 / Spevatamig (CLDN18.2 × CD47) Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 2 + AG: mPFS 7.3mo, 6mo-PFS 59%, 6mo-OS 93%, DCR 93%, ORR 33%
CLDN18.2 IBI343 (ADC-exatecan) Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 2/3 Monotherapy: ORR 22.7%, DCR 81.8%, PFS 5.4mo, OS 8.5mo
CLDN18.2 FG-M108 (ADCC-enhanced mAb) Treatment-naive (CLDN18.2 mid-high expr) Phase 2 Phase 3 + AG (32 pts): ORR 53.1%, DCR 100%, DOR 9.9mo, PFS 9.9mo
Immunotherapy
PD-1/TGF-β TQB2868 + 安罗替尼 + AG Treatment-naive Phase 3 36 evaluable: ORR 63.9%, DCR 100%, 6mo-PFS 86%, 6mo-OS 95%
TF (⚠️ Ocular toxicity — caution with glaucoma)
TF MRG004A (ADC-MMAE) Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 3 1st line (10 pts): ORR 40%, DCR 80%, PFS 5.8mo, OS 13.2mo
≥2nd line (27 pts): ORR 18.5%, PFS 2.7mo
MTAP Deletion
MTAP BMS-986504 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 2 Monotherapy (35 PDAC): ORR 17%, DCR 69%
MTAP ABSK131 / GH56 / AMG 193 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1/2 Dose exploration
Personalized Cancer Vaccines
Personalized mRNA Vaccine (Ruijin 瑞金) NCT05916248 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1
Personalized mRNA Vaccine (Guangzhou Medical Univ.) NCT06195384 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1
Personalized Peptide Vaccines (Nanchang, HKU-Shenzhen) Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1
Personalized srRNA Vaccine (Peking Univ. Cancer Hospital) NCT05579275 Locally advanced / metastatic Phase 1
Other Known Targetable Mutations (Approved Drugs)
BRCA1/2 Olaparib / Rucaparib / FOLFIRINOX or platinum-based Germline & somatic Approved PARP inhibitors
BRAF V600E Dabrafenib + Trametinib Somatic Approved Dual MAPK pathway blockade
RET Fusion Selpercatinib Somatic Approved Selective RET kinase inhibitor
NTRK1/2/3 Larotrectinib / Entrectinib / Repotrectinib Somatic Approved TRK inhibitors
NRG1 Fusion Zenocutuzumab Somatic Approved HER2/HER3 bispecific antibody
HER2 Amp Trastuzumab deruxtecan Somatic Approved HER2 ADC
FGFR1/2/3 Erdafitinib Somatic Approved Pan-FGFR TKI
MSI-H / TMB-H Nivolumab+Ipilimumab / Pembrolizumab Somatic Approved Immune checkpoint inhibitors

Anti-Recurrence Vaccines — Post-Surgery Prevention

Personalized cancer vaccines designed to prevent recurrence after curative-intent surgery. All trials are in China.

Name Company Hospital Requirements Notes
PCNAT-01 安达生物 上海长海 / 中山 Completed 12 cycles mFOLFIRINOX post-surgery, no radiological recurrence Peptide vaccine for recurrence prevention
AK154 康方生物 上海复旦肿瘤 Surgery at Fudan Cancer, vaccine first then sequential mFOLFIRINOX mRNA vaccine — chemo start delayed due to vaccination schedule
RGL-270 瑞宏迪 上海复旦肿瘤 Post-surgery, completed 6mo chemo, no radiological recurrence mRNA vaccine — may be full (verify)
XH001 新合生物 北京协和 Surgery at PUMCH (fresh tissue needed), not yet started chemo mRNA vaccine — combined with chemo (mFOLFIRINOX or GemCap)
XP-004 信普 上海瑞金 Elderly patients unable to tolerate chemo mRNA vaccine — no chemotherapy
R01 纽安津 浙一 / 邵逸夫 Surgery at the same hospital, no neoadjuvant mRNA vaccine — combined with GemCap or mFOLFIRINOX. Also has late-stage trial
LK101 立康 海南 Self-pay (150,000 RMB/shot × 4-7 shots) mRNA-DC vaccine — expensive, self-pay only
ABO2109 艾博生物 上海 / 苏州 Surgery at partner hospital, no neoadjuvant mRNA vaccine — combined with chemo

Other Anti-Recurrence Approaches

Name Company Hospital Requirements Notes
CT041 (CAR-T, anti-CLDN18.2) 科济制药 上海复旦肿瘤 Post-surgery with elevated CA19-9. Applying for market approval (gastric cancer; pancreatic indication unclear) Phase I: ORR 16.7%, DCR 70.8%, mOS 10.0mo in advanced patients
VRT106 (Oncolytic Virus) 威溶特医药 广东省人民医院 Post-surgery combined with GemCap

Revolution Medicines (RMC) Pipeline — Global Reference

RMC drugs are primarily available in the US. Included here for comparison with Chinese domestic alternatives.

RMC-6236 (Pan-RAS Inhibitor)

Trial Regimen Patients Side Effects (≥10%) Efficacy
2023 ESMO RMC-6236 monotherapy 14 PDAC + 9 NSCLC Rash 52%, diarrhea 21%, nausea 21%, vomiting 15% ORR 36%, DCR 86%
2025 ASCO RMC-6236 monotherapy (160-300mg QD) 127 RAS-mutant PDAC Rash 91%, diarrhea 48%, nausea 43%, vomiting 31%, stomatitis 31% KRAS G12X: ORR 29%, RAS-mutant: ORR 25%
RASolute 302 (Phase 3) RMC-6236 vs chemo 460 previously treated mPDAC, 1:1 randomization RMC-6236: mOS 13.2mo vs chemo 6.7mo
RASolute 303 (Phase 3) RMC-6236 ± chemo Treatment-naive (started Feb 2026) Ongoing
NCT07252232 (Phase 3) Post-surgery RMC-6236 + chemo ~500 patients Adjuvant setting — ongoing

RMC-9805 (KRAS G12D Inhibitor)

Trial Regimen Patients Side Effects (≥10%) Efficacy
2025 ASCO RMC-9805 (150-1200mg QD) 179 KRAS G12D solid tumors (104 PDAC) At 1200mg/600mg BID: nausea 27%, diarrhea 20%, vomiting 15%, rash 10% At 1200mg QD or 600mg BID (n=40): ORR 30%, DCR 80%
NCT06040541 (Phase 1) A: RMC-9805 mono; B: + RMC-6236 Locally advanced / metastatic solid tumors Ongoing

RMC-5127 (KRAS G12V Inhibitor) & Preclinical

Drug Target Trial Arms
RMC-5127 KRAS G12V NCT07349537 (Phase 1) A: mono dose escalation; B: + RMC-6236; C: + cetuximab
RMC-7977 Pan-KRAS Preclinical
RMC-9945 KRAS G12D Preclinical

Post-Surgery Adjuvant Chemotherapy — Evidence Summary

Comparison of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after curative-intent PDAC resection. Data from major clinical trials.

Year Comparison Key Results
2017 GemCap (双滨) vs Gemcitabine alone GemCap mOS 28.0mo vs Gem 25.5mo
2025 GemCap vs Gemcitabine (updated) R0 patients: Gem mOS 32.2mo vs GemCap 49.9mo. Node-negative: GemCap 5yr-OS 59% vs Gem 53%
2018 mFOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine mFOLFIRINOX: mOS 54mo vs Gem 36mo, 5yr-OS 43.2% vs 31.4%. Higher toxicity.
2022 mFOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine (updated) mFOLFIRINOX: mDFS 21.4mo vs 12.8mo, 5yr-DFS 26.1% vs 19.0%, mOS 53.5mo vs 35.5mo, 5yr-OS 43.2% vs 31.4%
2016 S-1 vs Gemcitabine (Japan) S-1: mOS 47mo vs Gem 26mo, 5yr-OS 44% vs 24%
2020 Network Meta-Analysis mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 most effective. mFOLFIRINOX preferred first-line adjuvant. For patients intolerant to mFOLFIRINOX, Gem+nab-paclitaxel showed no additional benefit over Gem alone.
2023 AG vs Gemcitabine AG: mDFS 16.6mo vs Gem 13.7mo, mOS 41.8mo vs 37.7mo

Key Takeaway for Patients

mFOLFIRINOX is the most effective adjuvant regimen (5yr-OS 43%) but has higher toxicity. GemCap (双滨) is a good alternative with lower toxicity and strong results (49.9mo mOS in R0 patients). Discuss with your oncologist which regimen best suits your condition and tolerance.

Disclaimer: This data is compiled by a non-professional volunteer (整理人: G) for reference purposes only. Updated as of April 25, 2026. Information may not be 100% accurate and clinical trial availability may change without notice. This resource does not constitute medical advice. Always consult your treating oncologist before making treatment decisions. For trial enrollment, contact the hospital's international department directly.